Meeting notes – 2026-04-22

Agenda

Attendees

Please provide your name and the name of your organization so that we can get an idea of the scope of our activities (this information is publicly available and will be stored for future reference)

• Ronald Steffen (FU Berlin)

• Thomas Jurczyk (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)

• Axel Dürkop (Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)))

• Sebastian Schmidt (SLUB Dresden)

• Albert Krewinkel (FU Berlin)

• Xenia van Edig (TIB)

• Jens Freund (University and State Library Darmstadt)

• Sabrina Schotten (Freie Universität Berlin/Open Gender Journal)

• Michael Wagner (LZI Schloss Dagstuhl)

• Martin Haug (Typst)

• Laurenz Mädje (Typst)

• Lara Babic (UB Mainz)

• Kristin Ameis (SUB Hamburg)

• Daniela Haferkamp (UB Duisburg-Essen)

• Yann Trividic (Université Paris-Saclay, éditions Burn~Aoû)

• Mark Kirstein (Wirtschaftsdienst@ZBW)

• Sebastian Wolf (UB Bielefeld)

• Daniel Beucke (SUB Göttingen)

• Jan Hagedoorn (UV Potsdam)

• Kathrin Ganz (FU Berlin / Open Gender Journal)

• Gerwin Kasperek (UB JCS Frankfurt am Main)

• Raphaël Tournoy (CNRS - CCSD/Episciences)

• Camille Gobert (Université Paris-Saclay)

• Gaëlle Coqueugniot (CNRS / MSH Lyon - Saint-Etienne)

• Frederik Eichler (SciFlow)

• João Martins (USB Köln)

• Linda Groß (UB Bochum)

• Jennifer Ramirez (ZB MED)

• Til Hillebrecht (Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH))

• Prince Oppong Boakye (University of Münster(Replication Research))

• Oliver Krüger (SUB Hamburg)

• Mark Gromowski (IfADo)

• Aris Goudouras (https://oktana.dev/)

• Marco Winkler (Universität Potsdam, Universitätsverlag)

• Denis Maier (UB Bern / Judaica: Neue digitale Folge)

• Isabella Meinecke (SUB Hamburg)

• Dominik Baumgartner (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)

• Anna-Lea Krampe (HSBI)

Notes

Notes of this session

• LLM citation parsing. How could test be designed to verify results?

• Metadata ingestion

• Positive use of AI models: helping non-English speakers collaborte. Axel pointed to https://translate-science.codeberg.page/ as a pre-LLM boom initiative along these lines.

• AI as a first layer of quality control to reduce workload so human reviewers focus on deeper scientific judgement

Suggested topics

Topic suggestions for future meetings are most welcome; please put them either in the list below, or, even better, add them to this thread on the EDCH forum.

• Inform the group how to set up local LLMs and agents to experiment with

• OS-APS

• Understanding existing editing and publishing workflows and pain points (from a user experience / domain experts’ perspective)

• Identifying components and processes that can be de-commodified (e.g. often done with proprietary tools or without standards compliance)

• JATS and its validation

• Human-computer interaction ideas, questions and findings regarding SSP (e.g., user interface and interaction challenges pertaining to working with multiple output formats in parallel).